They are suffering the effects of the struggle against Marxism. Not from the Russian or Chinese but from the battle that is going on in the west. A huge portion of the "environmental" agenda is not really about the environment but merely using that as a banner to push for Marxism.
From the Western perspective, the undeveloped world is two things.
Firstly, it is a cheap source of materials. Unlike the past history of colonialism, the west has figured out it is a lot easier to prop up dictators to manage things rather than going in with force to build a colony. Instead of sending in troops with weapons, all they have to do is send the weapons and let the dictators handle the rest. That way, they can just sit back and extract the resources by paying the dictators at a great discount and pretend that they are not interfering and are not responsible for what goes on. Of course when the dictators are well armed, the only option for many people is just to flee. That is the majority of the people are that are flooding into the west as refugees.
Secondly, they see the people in those countries as just another of the species in a combination theme park and zoo. They really don't see the humans as people, they are just another exhibit to curate and maintain. Any development is fought with the same fervor as protecting the environment of the chimpanzee and gorilla from the impact of "the modern world." It is OK to go there and enjoy the safari experience but their current way of life must be maintained.
Having lived in Africa for more than a decade, I wholeheartedly agree with your statement. Africa is nothing more than a land populated by insignificant useless eaters whose land & resources are to be raped to enrich the West. Africa is Bill Gate’s Petri dish.
Energy is so important for getting even the basic necessity of water to those living in the bush. A well with a pump in a village saves so many footsteps for mostly women and girls.
Thanks for having me
They are suffering the effects of the struggle against Marxism. Not from the Russian or Chinese but from the battle that is going on in the west. A huge portion of the "environmental" agenda is not really about the environment but merely using that as a banner to push for Marxism.
From the Western perspective, the undeveloped world is two things.
Firstly, it is a cheap source of materials. Unlike the past history of colonialism, the west has figured out it is a lot easier to prop up dictators to manage things rather than going in with force to build a colony. Instead of sending in troops with weapons, all they have to do is send the weapons and let the dictators handle the rest. That way, they can just sit back and extract the resources by paying the dictators at a great discount and pretend that they are not interfering and are not responsible for what goes on. Of course when the dictators are well armed, the only option for many people is just to flee. That is the majority of the people are that are flooding into the west as refugees.
Secondly, they see the people in those countries as just another of the species in a combination theme park and zoo. They really don't see the humans as people, they are just another exhibit to curate and maintain. Any development is fought with the same fervor as protecting the environment of the chimpanzee and gorilla from the impact of "the modern world." It is OK to go there and enjoy the safari experience but their current way of life must be maintained.
Having lived in Africa for more than a decade, I wholeheartedly agree with your statement. Africa is nothing more than a land populated by insignificant useless eaters whose land & resources are to be raped to enrich the West. Africa is Bill Gate’s Petri dish.
Energy is so important for getting even the basic necessity of water to those living in the bush. A well with a pump in a village saves so many footsteps for mostly women and girls.
Just stop Toil. Great tag line!